Почему - Саманта Клейнберг (2017)
-
Год:2017
-
Название:Почему
-
Автор:
-
Жанр:
-
Язык:Русский
-
Страниц:161
-
Рейтинг:
-
Ваша оценка:
Почему - Саманта Клейнберг читать онлайн бесплатно полную версию книги
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2): 461–464.
Scriven, M. (1966). Causes, connections and conditions in history. In W. H. Dray (ed.), Philosophical Analysis and History, pp. 238–264. Harper & Row, New York.
Seok, J., Warren, H. S., Cuenca, A. G., Mindrinos, M. N., Baker, H. V., et al. (2013). Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(9): 3507–3512.
Shalizi, C. R. and Thomas, A. C. (2011). Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies. Sociological Methods Research, 40(2): 211–239.
Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(1): 1–21.
Shanks, D. R. (1995). The Psychology of Associative Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., and Dickinson, A. (1989). Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality by Human Subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 B(2): 139–159.
Sidhu, D. (2015). Moneyball Sentencing. Boston College Law Review, 56(2): 671–731.
Silverman, R. H., Das Gupta, J., Lombardi, V. C., Ruscetti, F. W., Pfost, M. A., Hagen, K. S., Peterson, D. L., Ruscetti, S. K., Bagni, R. K., Petrow-Sadowski, C., Gold, B., Dean, M., and Mikovits, J. (2011). Partial retraction. Science, 334(6053): 176.
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 13(2): 238–241.
Skyrms, B. (1984). EPR: Lessons for Metaphysics. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 9(1): 245–255.
Slobogin, C. (2012). Risk Assessment. In J. Petersilia and K. R. Reitz (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections, pp. 196–214. Oxford University Press, New York.
Sloman, S. A. and Lagnado, D. (2015). Causality in Thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 66: 223–247.
Smith, G. C. S. and Pell, J. P. (2003). Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 327(7429): 1459–1461.
Snow, J. (1854). The Cholera Near Golden Square, and at Deptford. Medical Times and Gazette, 9: 321–322.
Snow, J. (1855). On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. John Churchill, London.
Sobel, D. M. and Kirkham, N. Z. (2006). Blickets and babies: The development of causal reasoning in toddlers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 42(6): 1103–1115.
Sobel, D. M. and Kushnir, T. (2006). The importance of decision making in causal learning from interventions. Memory & Cognition, 34(2): 411–419.
Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Gopnik, A. (2004). Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28(3): 303–333.
Sober, E. (1987). Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Principle of the Common Cause. Philosophy of Science, 54(3): 465–469.
Sober, E. (2001). Venetian Sea Levels, British Bread Prices, and the Principle of the Common Cause. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(2): 331–346.
Sober, E. and Papineau, D. (1986). Causal Factors, Causal Inference, Causal Explanation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 60: 97–136.
Sonnenberg, L., Gelsomin, E., Levy, D. E., Riis, J., Barraclough, S., and Thorndike, A. N. (2013). A traffic light food labeling intervention increases consumer awareness of health and healthy choices at the point-of-purchase. Preventive Medicine, 57(4): 253–257.
Spanos, N. P. and Gottlieb, J. (1976). Ergotism and the Salem Village Witch Trials. Science, 194(4272): 1390–1394.